0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°£È£±³À° ¼º°ú ÃøÁ¤ µµ±¸ÀÇ Å½»ö

Exploratory Study on Scales of Nursing Education Outcome

µ¿¼­°£È£Çבּ¸Áö 2010³â 16±Ç 1È£ p.53 ~ 60
KMID : 0869520100160010053
ÀÌÇâ·Ã ( Lee Hyang-Yeon ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

¿À°¡½Ç ( Oh Ka-Sil ) - ¿ï¶õ¹ÙŸ¸£´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
¾È¾çÈñ ( Ahn Yang-Heui ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
À̼÷ÀÚ ( Lee Sook-Ja ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
±èÀÎÀÚ ( Kim In-Ja ) - ´ëÀü´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify and evaluate outcome measurement scales of nursing education such as communication, professionalism, leadership, and critical thinking.

Methods: A methodological study design was used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scales. Survey was done to the students (n=407) enrolled in baccalaureate nursing schools. Using convenience sampling method, we tried to include all grades of students. Internal consistency, convergent validity and group comparison were used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scales.

Results: All scales were reliable and valid. Only convergent validity of the scale to measure critical thinking was relatively low. It suggested that critical thinking skill and disposition might be measured separately. Also it was inefficient to measure the nursing education outcomes with separate scales.

Conclusions: It is recommended to develop a new integrative scale to measure nursing education outcomes. Also it is necessary to set the norm of nursing students to evaluate nursing education outcomes for the quality control of nursing education.
KeyWords
°£È£±³À°, ÀÇ»ç¼ÒÅë, Áöµµ·Â, Àü¹®Á÷°ü, ºñÆÇÀû »ç°í
Nursing education, Communication, Professionalism, Leadership, Critical thinking
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)